Paradox of voting - Wikipedia
WEBThe paradox of voting, also called Downs' paradox, is that for a rational and self-interested voter, the costs of voting will normally exceed the expected benefits.
Paradox of Voting: Explanation and Examples - Philosophy Terms
WEBWhat is the Paradox of Voting? The Paradox of Voting is a tricky idea that people study in subjects like economics, politics, and even psychology. It first came from a guy named Anthony Downs, an economist, who wrote about it in 1957.
Paradox of Voting - Encyclopedia.com
WEBThe most common form of the paradox of voting refers to a situation where the outcome of majority-rule voting over a discrete set of candidates produces no clear winner, even though each individual voter has a clear and transitive rank ordering of preferences over the alternative options.
The Ethics and Rationality of Voting - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
WEBJul 28, 2016 · One popular response to the paradox of voting is to posit that voters are not trying to determine who wins, but instead trying to change the “mandate” the elected candidate receives.
Paradox of voting - Oxford Reference
WEBSep 13, 2024 · The paradox is that electoral turnout is relatively high. Possible explanations include irrationality, social customs, and social duties. See also collective choice; majority voting.
Condorcet paradox - Wikipedia
WEBIn social choice theory, Condorcet's voting paradox is a fundamental discovery by the Marquis de Condorcet that majority rule is inherently self-contradictory.
Arrow’s Theorem - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
WEBOct 13, 2014 · This is the “paradox of voting”. Discovered by the Marquis de Condorcet (1785), it shows that possibilities for choosing rationally can be lost when individual preferences are aggregated into social preferences.
Paradox of Voting - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
WEBBecause one vote has but an infinitesimal influence on the electoral outcome, the rational behavior, at first sight, would be not to bother going to the polls, and since Downs, a large body of literature has been devoted to what appeared as the ‘voting paradox.’
WEBThis was probably the tightest election that most people will ever witness — yet no single vote came close to proving pivotal. So to fully understand why people vote requires us to move beyond economics and into the realm of social psychology. Most people have a natural desire to be part of a group.
Voting Paradoxes - SpringerLink
WEBNov 27, 2016 · As suggested by the ‘don’t waste your vote’ cry for strategic voting, situations exist where, by voting strategically, some voters can block personally lower-ranked candidates from winning. The Gibbard–Satterthewaite result proves this happens for all realistic rules.